JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 27, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Jonhfer De Jesus Palacios Lloreda

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Tutela
  • Competencia para ordenar en abstracto indemnización de daño emergente
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Trámite incidente de liquidación de perjuicios
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró que el Juzgado de la referencia es competente para avocar e impartir el trámite de incidente de liquidación conforme al Art. 25 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, dentro de la acción de tutela promovida por accionante y otros, contra el departamento del Chocó.

Lo anterior, porque la Corte explicó que el mencionado Juzgado es el competente para avocar e impartir el trámite al incidente liquidatorio dentro del expediente, según lo estipulado en el ordenamiento jurídico que regula la materia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar que el Juzgado unico Laboral del Circuito de Quibdo es competente para avocar e impartir el tramite de incidente de liquidacion conforme al articulo 25 del decreto 2591 de 1991, dentro de la accion de tutela promovida por Jonhfer de Jesus Palacio y Otros, contra el departamento del Choco.
  2. Segundo. Ordenar el envio del expediente al Juzgado Unico Laboral del Circuito de Quibdo, para los efectos de ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.